Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erniesty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete as nonsense.. Richard 08:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested Prod. May be speediable, but I wanted to be sure. Wikipedia is not for made up religions. Flyguy649 talk contribs 18:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This article is asking questions. How easy is it to set up a new religion. Are there any other internet spread religions. This is supposed to be the place to find answers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.156.73.159 (talk • contribs) 18:55, July 11, 2007 (UTC) — 81.156.73.159 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- I pointed to a place you can ask questions on your talk page. Flyguy649 talk contribs 19:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - two blog entries are not reliable sources so fails WP:V and WP:N. No evidence that this is anything other than a gleam in the eye of the creator. Bridgeplayer 18:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The question is how easy is it to set up a new religion....You would think that that question alone would be a great spark for a debate on Wikipedia.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.73.159 (talk)
- We're not a debate team. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 19:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A whopping ZERO hits on Google. This article should have been speedy deleted under G1 criteria. Trusilver 19:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not convinced it's patent nonsense, but I'd be happy with that. Flyguy649 talk contribs 19:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the last place I thought I'd find narrow minds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.73.159 (talk)
- We're not narrow, we just don't allow articles for anything that's not notable. Note that User:Flyguy649 included a link where you can find help within the walls of Wikipedia. We are trying to help you. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 19:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it's definitely not an article, and could probably be considered patent nonsense and speedied. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Amusing, but original research and the writer clearly doesn't understand the purpose of wikipedia. But I may read his site, thanks for the smiles, I wish him well.Merkinsmum 21:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No assertion of notability beyond a link to the creator's MySpace page and a mirror so can it be made speedy under A7? Iain99 21:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as something made up in school one day. Capmango 06:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Sheesh ... G1 or G11. Take your pick, just get rid of it and get rid of it now. Blueboy96 19:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.